In case anyone is interested, the root of the problem, for me at least, seems to be that GRBL gets confused by cutter compensation - G41 and G42 - on small arcs. To: gnea/grbl Subscribed Re: CAMWorks GRBL postprocessor ( #237) G40 is supported but it does nothing, It’s just there to prevent errors if the Gcode specifically states Cutter compensation is off. You are receiving this because you commented.Īs far as I am aware Grbl does not support G41 or G42 They should be rejected by Grbl as an error 20. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > documentation you used to get so far? Solidworks support is not > Solidworks and a GRBL based small milling machine I am very interested > It did happen and Solidworks 2018 has built in CAM.

I have a custom post processor for grbl made. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Machine->Edit definition->Post processor tab->Browse->Selectĭisclaimer: I'm really a newbie at G-code and/or CamWorks, so THE FILE IS Just unzip it somewhere on hard drive and point CamWorks to it It supports linear and arc moves, variable spindle speed and no tool Possible postprocessor for our controller. And theīest CAM embedded in SolidWorks tested so far. Introducing-solidworks-cam-smart-manufacturing-ecosystem.html). Will become official SolidWorks' CAM module next year (

Just in case someone will use GRBL with CAM module for SolidWorks that

Cam works